by Alan Nelson
I recently found myself in a meeting discussing what professional associations are all about. We came up with three things:
Capability: A body of knowledge and a set of skills that you can expect a particular type of professional to come equipped with.
Currency: A process by which the members stay up to date and abreast of new developments in their field.
Conduct: An ethical code that defines acceptable behaviour as a professional
When the third of these is taken for granted - which it too often has been in the past – the fallout can be significant. High profile cases such as Harold Shipman or Enron are tragic in themselves and have dramatic consequences for the reputations of the professions involved, with many excellent doctors and accountants taking an undeserved battering. Indeed, without a strongly communicated and enforced code of conduct, it is impossible for any profession to rebuff George Bernard Shaw’s well known accusation that the professions are a “conspiracy against the laity”.
It is therefore noticeable that while we have worked over the years on many projects connected both with capability (a wide range of online distance learning resources) and currency (online CPD materials), we have until recently very rarely been asked to focus on ethics.
But now a flurry of new projects has changed that. If this reflects a new focus on conduct then it is only to be applauded. We are learning quickly about this new area and as is the case with so many other areas of our work, a different approach has been appropriate in each case.
In our own publishing programme we work with most of the accounting bodies and ethics is a key issue for every one. They each have to comply with the ethical guidelines laid down by the international coordinating body IFAC. The problem for us in producing something useful is that they have each interpreted those guidelines differently, using different terminology to describe the same things. Most have also integrated ethics pretty significantly into their qualification curriculum and so although there is a need to encourage members to keep ethics at the forefront of their minds, there is less of a need to teach them the basics. So we have instead opted for a case study approach. Members are presented with series of scenarios and asked how they would handle the difficult situations described. They learn in three stages: by thinking it through for themselves; by reading a model answer form the expert; and by reading the answers given by other members of their professional body. This approach highlights the need to think of ethics not as something you learn and finish with but as an ongoing and evolving issue.
At Resolution, the Code in Practice has always been regarded as central to their mission. Joining Resolution is a declaration that you intend to practise family law in a different, less adversarial way. The organisation has been successful and has expanded. Good news, but with it comes new problems. As membership expands there is a risk that the things that were easy to ensure when you were a cosy club get watered down. To avoid this happening, Resolution created a short course on the Code and mandated that every new member should attend it within a year of joining. The online version of this course, that we have created, enables Resolution to enforce compliance – no more excuses that people couldn’t attend because it wasn’t convenient for them!
As for the third example, I can’t tell you much yet. We have just reached agreement with STEP – the Society of Trust & Estate Practitioners – to create a short course on ethics for their members. Our first planning meeting for the project is next week, so I can’t tell you what approach we’ll take, but suffice to say that I’d lay odds on it being different to either of the others I have described above!